← All companies

Stripe

Global payments infrastructure.

FintechUnited States·Founded 2010·ISO/NSO equity·stripe.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
Reference estimate only
4 methods · Source-audited Jun 12, 2026Low confidence (34%)

The four valuation methods disagree significantly (3.4× spread). Treat this as a wide reference range only — not a reliable point estimate.

$159B
wide range · ~$137B – ~$185B
Implied per-share: $54.6 · vs last primary +1%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Valuation basis:Latest valuation event+ secondary signal · Tender · 2026-02Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
Latest valuation event
$159B
Tender Offer · 4mo ago
Secondary signal
$159.0B
Tender · 2026-02+0%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
8,500
employees · LinkedIn+9%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$9.5B
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Source verification: Stripe 2025 Annual Letter · Bloomberg Feb 2026 · manual-source-audit-2026-06

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorFintechhigh
HeadquartersUnited Stateshigh
Founded2010high
Websitestripe.comhigh
Latest valuation event
Post-money valuation$159Bhigh
Round nameTender Offerhigh
Date2026-02-24 (4 months ago)high
Lead investorhigh
Amount raisedNot disclosedmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares2,950Mlow
Implied share price (illustrative only)~$55low
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$9,500Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)16.7xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)8,500medium
Employees (12 months ago)7,800medium
12-month headcount growth+9%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyARKFmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)18%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$159Blatest · Tender Offer
Total growth
2×
$0.0B$46.9B$93.8B$141B$188B$95.0BSeries H↓ down$50.0BSeries I$91.5BEmployee Tend…latestTender Offer
Primary round
Down round
Tender Offer+74%2026-02-24
$159.0B
Led by
Employee Tender+83%2025-02-27
$91.5B
Led by Sequoia
Source: WSJ Feb 2025(historical ref.)
Series I↓ DOWN ROUND2023-03-15
$50.0B
Led by GIC · raised $6.5B
Source: Reuters Mar 2023(historical ref.)
Series H2021-03-14
$95.0B
Led by Allianz · raised $600M
Source: TechCrunch(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$159B
Tender
$140B$153B$165B$178B2026-02

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-02-24tenderTender

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
GPNGlobal Payments Inc.2.32x
MAMastercard Incorporated13.6x
MELIMercadoLibre, Inc.2.78x
NUNu Holdings Ltd.8.57x
VVisa Inc.15.52x

Typical strike prices by cohort

Strike ranges by cohort: aggregated from Glassdoor, Teamblind threads, Carta's published industry data and reports from employees. Indicative only — your actual 409A at grant time is the only authoritative number.

2020 cohort
$15–$25
per share
2021 cohort
$55–$90
per share
2022 cohort
$40–$60
per share
2023 cohort
$28–$45
per share
2024 cohort
$55–$75
per share
2025 cohort
$85–$110
per share

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%suppressed23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 6.0x → 10% private-company discount → 5.4x on $9500M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($159B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $159.0B40% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 1 verified secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $173.2B78% confidence
$159B round (2026-02-24) × 1.11× growth × 0.98× multiple decay over 0.4 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $168.6B55% confidence
$159B × (1 + 18% p.j.)^0.4yr = $168.6B via ARKF ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
34%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
Low

Worked example for an employee

Illustrative mechanics only — this shows how the equity model works, not a reliable value estimate.

Illustrative mechanics only

This example shows equity mechanics only. It is not a reliable estimate of current value because model support is weak (confidence 34%, spread 3.4×).

Show illustrative values (not a reliable estimate) ▸
Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Stripe 24 months ago (2024-07-03) with 2,000 options at a strike price of $65/share, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$55
weighted average of 4 methods — low confidence
Gross vested value
$54,612
vested shares × implied price
Exercise cost
$65,000
1,000 × $65 strike
Net of exercise
$0
gross − exercise cost
Tax (rough)
$0
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
Underwater
Projected share price ($62) sits below strike — exercising would cost more than the shares are worth.
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
Underwater
Projected share price ($32) sits below strike — exercising would cost more than the shares are worth.
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
Underwater
Projected share price ($46) sits below strike — exercising would cost more than the shares are worth.
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These illustrative values use the same calculation engine as the live calculator, but the underlying model is low-confidence for Stripe. Use your own numbers as a starting point only. Try the calculator →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
2950M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
10% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Stripe we use 10% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
34% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
ARKF @ 18%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of ARKF as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Stripe. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.