← All companies

Redwood Materials

Battery recycling and materials company recovering lithium, cobalt, nickel, and copper from end-of-life EV batteries and electronics to re-manufacture cathode and anode materials. Series C at $5B (Aug 2022, Goldman Sachs AM); $2B DoE loan guarantee received in 2023. Founded by JB Straubel (Tesla co-founder/CTO), with customers including Panasonic, Ford, and Volvo.

Climate🇺🇸 United StatesFounded 2017ISO/NSO equityredwoodmaterials.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 24, 2026Medium confidence (36%)
$3.6B
range $0.2B – $7.1B⚠ methods disagree (6.9× spread)
Implied per-share: $14.0 · vs last primary -27%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$5B
Series C · 46mo ago
Secondary signal
$3.8B
Hiive · 2026-03-25%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
1,200
employees · LinkedIn+33%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$250M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorClimatehigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 United Stateshigh
Founded2017high
Websiteredwoodmaterials.comhigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$5Bhigh
Round nameSeries Chigh
Date2022-08-09 (46 months ago)high
Lead investorGoldman Sachs Asset Managementhigh
Amount raised$692Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares260Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$14medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$250Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)20.0xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)1,200medium
Employees (12 months ago)900medium
12-month headcount growth+33%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyICLNmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)8%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$5.0Blatest · Series C
Total growth
7×
Our estimate
$3.6B
$0.0B$1.5B$2.9B$4.4B$5.9BSeries A$3.7BSeries BlatestSeries Cest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series C+35%2022-08-09
$5.0B
Led by Goldman Sachs Asset Management · raised $692M
Source: Bloomberg Aug 2022
Series B+429%2021-07-28
$3.7B
Led by T. Rowe Price · raised $700M
Source: TechCrunch Jul 2021
Series A2020-09-15
$0.7B
Led by Breakthrough Energy Ventures · raised $40M
Source: TechCrunch Sep 2020

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$3.8B+16% vs first recorded
Ask
Bid
$3.2B$3.4B$3.6B$3.9B2025-102026-03

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-03-05bidHiive$15
2025-10-14askForge$13

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CWENClearway Energy, Inc.6.3x
ENPHEnphase Energy, Inc.6.03x
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.5.11x
NEENextEra Energy, Inc.6.63x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $1.0B23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 5.6x → 30% private-company discount → 3.9x on $250M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($4B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $3.6B55% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 2 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $4.9B20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$5B round (2022-08-09) × 3.12× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 3.8 years — capped at 1.3× recent secondary ($3.8B → $4.9B)
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $6.8B10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$5B × (1 + 8% p.j.)^3.8yr = $6.8B via ICLN ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
36%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Redwood Materials 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$14
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$13,966
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$13,966
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$1,444
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$15,788
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$8,147
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$11,871
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
260M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
30% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Redwood Materials we use 30% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
35% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
ICLN @ 8%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of ICLN as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Redwood Materials. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.