← All companies

OpenAI

Maker of ChatGPT, GPT-5, Sora and the OpenAI API.

AIUnited States·Founded 2015·PPU equity·openai.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
Current estimate
4 methods · Source-audited Jun 12, 2026High confidence (72%)
$998.6B
range $848.8B – $1,148.4B
Implied per-share: $699.0 · vs last primary +17%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Valuation basis:Last primary round+ secondary signal · Forge · 2026-06Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
Last primary round
$852B
Series H (close) · 3mo ago
Secondary signal
$1,085.6B
Forge · 2026-06+27%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
5,500
employees · LinkedIn+72%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$24.0B
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Source verification: Bloomberg Mar 2026 · Forge / Hiive Jun 2026 · OpenAI newsroom · manual-source-audit-2026-06

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorAIhigh
HeadquartersUnited Stateshigh
Founded2015high
Websiteopenai.comhigh
Last primary round
Post-money valuation$852Bhigh
Round nameSeries H (close)high
Date2026-03-31 (3 months ago)high
Lead investorSoftBank / Andreessen Horowitzhigh
Amount raised$122.0Bmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares1,428.571Mlow
Implied share price (4-method estimate)$699medium
Primary equity type grantedPPUhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$24,000Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)35.5xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)5,500medium
Employees (12 months ago)3,200medium
12-month headcount growth+72%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyBOTZmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)32%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$852Blatest · Series H (close)
Total growth
61×
Our estimate
$999B
$0.0B$295B$589B$884B$1.2TSeries CStrategicSeries F$300BSeries G$500BSecondary ten…$840BSeries H (ope…latestSeries H (clo…est.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series H (close)+1%2026-03-31
$852.0B
Led by SoftBank / Andreessen Horowitz · raised $122.0B
Series H (open)+68%2026-02-27
$840.0B
Led by SoftBank / Andreessen Horowitz · raised $110.0B
Source: TechCrunch Feb 2026(historical ref.)
Secondary tender+67%2025-10-15
$500.0B
Led by Thrive Capital · raised $6.6B
Source: Bloomberg / WSJ Oct 2025(historical ref.)
Series G+91%2025-03-31
$300.0B
Led by SoftBank · raised $40.0B
Source: Reuters Mar 2025(historical ref.)
Series F+441%2024-10-02
$157.0B
Led by Thrive Capital · raised $6.6B
Source: WSJ Oct 2024(historical ref.)
Strategic+107%2023-01-10
$29.0B
Led by Microsoft · raised $10.0B
Source: Bloomberg Jan 2023(historical ref.)
Series C2021-01-01
$14.0B
Led by Microsoft · raised $1.0B
Source: TechCrunch(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$1.03T-5% vs first recorded
Bid
$1.02T$1.04T$1.07T$1.10T2026-062026-06

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-06-09bidForge$734
2026-06-10bidHiive$696

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.154.46x
DDOGDatadog, Inc.25.64x
MDBMongoDB, Inc.11.11x
NETCloudflare, Inc.37.54x
NVDANVIDIA Corporation18.88x
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.57.7x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $966.4B75% confidence
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 44.7x → 10% private-company discount → 40.3x on $24000M revenue
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $1,057.6B70% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 2 verified secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $949.4B80% confidence
$852B round (2026-03-31) × 1.13× growth × 0.99× multiple decay over 0.3 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $915.3B56% confidence
$852B × (1 + 32% p.j.)^0.3yr = $915.3B via BOTZ ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
72%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
High

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined OpenAI 24 months ago (2024-07-03) with 2,000 units, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$699
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$699,013
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$699,013
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$216,823
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$790,189
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$407,758
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$594,161
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
1428.571429M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
10% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for OpenAI we use 10% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
60% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
BOTZ @ 32%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of BOTZ as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with OpenAI. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.