← All companies

Monzo

UK challenger bank with 10M+ personal and business customers — famous for its coral card, instant spending notifications, and no-fee overseas spending.

FintechUnited Kingdom·Founded 2015·RSU equity·monzo.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source review Jun 2026 — source URL pending
Reference estimate only
4 methods · Source review Jun 2026 — source URL pendingLow confidence (27%)

The four valuation methods disagree significantly (4.7× spread). Treat this as a wide reference range only — not a reliable point estimate.

$5.2B
wide range · ~$2B – ~$8B
Implied per-share: $19.1 · vs last primary -1%

No verified public secondary-market signal available for Monzo. The estimate relies on last confirmed financing, peer multiples, sector momentum, and time decay.

Valuation basis:Last primary roundSource review Jun 2026 — source URL pending
Last primary round
$5.2B
Growth · 28mo ago
Secondary signal
No verified secondary signal

No verified public secondary signal is available. Hiive/Forge links are monitoring links only, not evidence of a current executable price.

Headcount
3,500
employees · LinkedIn+17%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$400M
annual run rate · est.

Last confirmed equity primary: £430M Growth round at $5.2B (Mar 2024). A secondary transaction in Oct 2024 implied ~$5.9B — shown as a secondary signal below.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Source review: key primary-round source URL still pending. Figures are retained as historical reference and marked low-confidence where applicable.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorFintechhigh
HeadquartersUnited Kingdomhigh
Founded2015high
Websitemonzo.comhigh
Last primary round
Post-money valuation$5.2Bmedium
Round nameGrowthhigh
Date2024-03-01 (28 months ago)high
Lead investorCapitalG / HSBC Strategichigh
Amount raised$430Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares268.182Mlow
Implied share price (illustrative only)~$19low
Primary equity type grantedRSUhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$400Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)13.0xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)3,500medium
Employees (12 months ago)3,000medium
12-month headcount growth+17%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyFINXmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)5%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$5.2Blatest · Growth
Total growth
5×
$0.0B$1.5B$3.1B$4.6B$6.1BSeries D$2.5BSeries E↓ downSeries F$4.5BSeries GlatestGrowth
Primary round
Down round
Growth+16%2024-03-01
$5.2B
Led by CapitalG / HSBC Strategic · raised $430M
Source: Monzo blog · confirmed by FT Mar 2024(source URL pending)
Series G+254%2021-12-01
$4.5B
Led by Abu Dhabi Growth Fund · raised $500M
Source: Bloomberg Dec 2021(historical ref.)
Series F↓ DOWN ROUND2020-06-15
$1.3B
Led by Y Combinator Continuity · raised $68M
Source: TechCrunch Jun 2020(historical ref.)
Series E+150%2019-06-27
$2.5B
Led by Latitude Ventures · raised $147M
Source: TechCrunch Jun 2019(historical ref.)
Series D2018-10-31
$1.0B
Led by General Catalyst · raised $85M
Source: TechCrunch Oct 2018(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$5.9B
Trade
$5.2B$5.7B$6.1B$6.6B2024-10

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2024-10-01tradePublic Report$26

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
GPNGlobal Payments Inc.2.3x
MAMastercard Incorporated13.62x
NUNu Holdings Ltd.8.7x
SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.6.11x
VVisa Inc.15.39x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%suppressed23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 6.9x → 22% private-company discount → 5.4x on $400M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($5B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%suppressed25% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
No verified secondary market data available — estimate relies on primary round, peer multiples, and sector momentum.
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $10.1B38% confidence
$5.2B round (2024-03-01) × 2.21× growth × 0.88× multiple decay over 2.4 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%suppressed25% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$5.2B × (1 + 5% p.j.)^2.4yr = $5.8B via FINX ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
27%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
Low

Worked example for an employee

Illustrative mechanics only — this shows how the equity model works, not a reliable value estimate.

Illustrative mechanics only

This example shows equity mechanics only. It is not a reliable estimate of current value because model support is weak (confidence 27%, spread 4.7×).

Show illustrative values (not a reliable estimate) ▸
Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Monzo 24 months ago (2024-07-10) with 2,000 units, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$19
weighted average of 4 methods — low confidence
Gross vested value
$19,141
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$19,141
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$2,065
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$21,637
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$11,165
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$16,270
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These illustrative values use the same calculation engine as the live calculator, but the underlying model is low-confidence for Monzo. Use your own numbers as a starting point only. Try the calculator →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
268.181818M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
22% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Monzo we use 22% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
40% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
FINX @ 5%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of FINX as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Monzo. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.