Helsing

European AI defence company developing software-defined sensor fusion, threat recognition, and autonomous targeting systems for NATO allies. Series C at €4.9B (~$5.4B, Jun 2024, General Catalyst); customers include the German Bundeswehr, UK MoD, and French DGA. Positioned as the European answer to Palantir and Anduril — building AI that can run on classified networks without cloud dependency.

Defense🇩🇪 GermanyFounded 2021RSU equityhelsing.ai ↗

Compare ⇄Calculate →

Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)

Current estimate

4 methods · May 24, 2026Medium confidence (40%)

$5.0B

range $3.5B – $6.6B⚠ methods disagree (6.0× spread)

Implied per-share: $22.9 · vs last primary -7%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round

$5.4B

Series C · 24mo ago

Secondary signal

$5.0B

Hiive · 2026-04-8%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount

500

employees · LinkedIn+67%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)

$50M

annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Field	Value	Source	Confidence
Company fundamentals
Sector	Defense	Editorial classification	high
Headquarters	🇩🇪 Germany	Company website · Crunchbase	high
Founded	2021	Company website · Wikipedia	high
Website	helsing.ai	Direct	high
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation	$5.4B	FT Jun 2024	high
Round name	Series C	FT Jun 2024	high
Date	2024-06-05 (24 months ago)	FT Jun 2024	high
Lead investor	General Catalyst	FT Jun 2024	high
Amount raised	$490M	FT Jun 2024	medium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares	220M	SEC Form D · secondary price math · cap-table leaks › notes Public total fully-diluted share count: estimated from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market pricing math (implied valuation ÷ price per share), and leaked cap-table summaries. Considered the lowest-confidence input.	low
Implied share price (latest primary)	$23	Valuation × 1000 / share count (= $5.4B ÷ 220M)	medium
Primary equity type granted	RSU	Public reports of company equity practices	high
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)	$50M	Sacra · The Information · press leaks › notes Annual revenue: best public estimates from Sacra, The Information, WSJ leaks, or company-stated ARR. Where official, we cite the source on the funding round.	medium
EV / Revenue (implied)	108.0x	Computed from valuation ÷ revenue	medium
Headcount
Employees (now)	500	LinkedIn — current company page count › notes Headcount: LinkedIn 'Company' page employee count, taken now and approximately 12 months ago via the Wayback Machine. Treat as a directional proxy for revenue growth, not a hard number.	medium
Employees (12 months ago)	300	LinkedIn via Wayback Machine	medium
12-month headcount growth	+67%	Computed	medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxy	ITA	Editorial choice — most representative public ETF › notes Sector ETF: editorial choice of the most representative public-market proxy. Annual return: 3-year trailing average from Yahoo Finance, refreshed quarterly.	medium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)	28%	Yahoo Finance · refreshed quarterly	medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)

Valuation progression · equity rounds

$5.4Blatest · Series C

Total growth

11×

Our estimate

$5.0B

Primary round

Down round

Our estimate

Series C+116%2024-06-05

$5.4B

Led by General Catalyst · raised $490M

Source: FT Jun 2024

Series B+400%2022-10-13

$2.5B

Led by Accel · raised $209M

Source: TechCrunch Oct 2022

Series A2021-12-01

$0.5B

Led by Spotify CEO / Various · raised $102M

Source: Sifted Dec 2021

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time

Implied valuation · secondary market

$5.0B+7% vs first recorded

Trade

⚠

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

Date	Type	Source	Price / share	Implied valuation
2026-04-18	trade	Hiive	$23	$5.0B
2026-02-12	trade	Forge	$21	$4.6B

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

Ticker	Company	EV / Revenue	Revenue growth	As of
AIR	AAR Corp.	1.38x	+25%	2026-05-24
KTOS	Kratos Defense & Security Solut	7.44x	+23%	2026-05-20
LMT	Lockheed Martin Corporation	1.64x	+0%	2026-05-20
PLTR	Palantir Technologies Inc.	62.81x	+85%	2026-05-20

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple

weight 25%→ $1.5B23% confidence

↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.

Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 41.8x → 30% private-company discount → 29.2x on $50M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($5B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.

Method B — Secondary-implied

weight 45%→ $4.8B55% confidence

Recency-weighted average of 2 secondary indications (180-day decay)

Method C — Primary time-decay

weight 20%→ $6.4B46% confidence

$5.4B round (2024-06-05) × 6.10× growth × 0.90× multiple decay over 2.0 years — capped at 1.3× recent secondary ($5.0B → $6.4B)

Method D — Sector momentum

weight 10%→ $8.8B30% confidence

$5.4B × (1 + 28% p.j.)^2.0yr = $8.8B via ITA ETF-proxy

Overall confidence

40%

Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.

Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Helsing 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 units, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.

Vesting

1,000 of 2,000

50% vested at month 24

Implied share price (mid)

$23

weighted average of 4 methods

Gross vested value

$22,935

vested shares × implied price

Net value

$22,935

no strike, gross = net

Tax (rough)

$2,520

US federal only · AMT risk: low

What if the next round is…

Up round +30%

$25,927

New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued

Down round −30%

$13,379

New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)

Secondary today

$19,495

Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate

These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count

220M shares

We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.

Common-stock waterfall

1.0× to common

We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.

Private-company illiquidity discount

30% off public peers

Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Helsing we use 30% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.

Revenue growth assumption (Method C)

150% YoY

Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.

Sector ETF momentum (Method D)

ITA @ 28%/year

Method D applies the trailing return of ITA as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.

Outlier auto-downweight

Methods >50% from median get ½ weight

Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.

Recency decay for secondary trades

180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)

A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.

Tax estimate

US federal only, single filer

Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.

All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Helsing. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.