← All companies

Gong

Revenue intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyses every sales call to surface insights on deal health, competitor mentions, and rep coaching opportunities.

SaaSUnited States·Founded 2015·ISO/NSO equity·gong.io
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
Reference estimate only
4 methods · Source-audited Jun 12, 2026Low confidence (22%)

The four valuation methods disagree significantly (16.5× spread). Treat this as a wide reference range only — not a reliable point estimate.

$7.25B
Range suppressed — methods disagree too widely (16.5× spread)
Implied per-share: $81.9 · vs last primary +1%

No verified public secondary-market signal available for Gong. The estimate relies on last confirmed financing, peer multiples, sector momentum, and time decay.

Valuation basis:Last primary roundSource-audited Jun 12, 2026
Last primary round
$7.25B
Series E · 61mo ago
Secondary signal
No verified secondary signal

No verified public secondary signal is available. Hiive/Forge links are monitoring links only, not evidence of a current executable price.

Headcount
900
employees · LinkedIn-5%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$280M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Source verification: TechCrunch Jun 2021 · $7.25B Series E · manual-source-audit-2026-06

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorSaaShigh
HeadquartersUnited Stateshigh
Founded2015high
Websitegong.iohigh
Last primary round
Post-money valuation$7.25Bhigh
Round nameSeries Ehigh
Date2021-06-03 (61 months ago)high
Lead investorFranklin Templetonhigh
Amount raised$250Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares89.024Mlow
Implied share price (illustrative only)~$82low
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$280Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)25.9xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)900medium
Employees (12 months ago)950medium
12-month headcount growth-5%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyIGVmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)3%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$7.3Blatest · Series E
Total growth
242×
$0.0B$2.1B$4.3B$6.4B$8.6BSeries ASeries BSeries C$2.2BSeries DlatestSeries E
Primary round
Down round
Series E+230%2021-06-03
$7.3B
Led by Franklin Templeton · raised $250M
Series D+182%2020-08-18
$2.2B
Led by Coatue Management · raised $200M
Source: TechCrunch Aug 2020(historical ref.)
Series C+160%2019-12-17
$0.8B
Led by Sequoia Capital · raised $65M
Source: TechCrunch Dec 2019(historical ref.)
Series B+900%2018-11-14
$0.3B
Led by Norwest Venture Partners · raised $40M
Source: TechCrunch Nov 2018(historical ref.)
Series A2017-06-01
$0.0B
Led by Battery Ventures · raised $5.5M
Source: Crunchbase(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

No active listings found

We monitor Hiive, Forge Global, and EquityZen for Gong listings. As of July 2026, no verified secondary market activity has been recorded.

Secondary listings for private companies appear without announcement and typically close within days. When a listing appears, it often signals an upcoming tender offer or funding round.

Primary round history as valuation signal

In the absence of secondary market data, the funding history below is the primary valuation anchor. Method C (time-decay) uses this data to estimate current value.

Series E · 2021-06$7.25B
Series D · 2020-08$2.2B
Series C · 2019-12$0.78B

Get notified when a listing appears

Pro subscribers get notified within 2 hours when a secondary listing for Gong is detected. Most employees first hear about tender offers days after the market already knows.

Get listing alerts →

Check directly: Hiive ↗ · Forge Global ↗ · SEC Form D ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CRMSalesforce, Inc.3.11x
HUBSHubSpot, Inc.3.2x
NOWServiceNow, Inc.8.04x
WDAYWorkday, Inc.3.47x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%suppressed23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 4.7x → 22% private-company discount → 3.7x on $280M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($7B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%suppressed25% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
No verified secondary market data available — estimate relies on primary round, peer multiples, and sector momentum.
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%suppressed20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$7.25B round (2021-06-03) × 2.76× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 5.1 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%suppressed10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$7.25B × (1 + 3% p.j.)^5.1yr = $8.3B via IGV ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
22%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
Low

Worked example for an employee

Illustrative mechanics only — this shows how the equity model works, not a reliable value estimate.

Illustrative mechanics only

This example shows equity mechanics only. It is not a reliable estimate of current value because model support is weak (confidence 22%, spread 16.5×).

Show illustrative values (not a reliable estimate) ▸
Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Gong 24 months ago (2024-07-10) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$82
weighted average of 4 methods — low confidence
Gross vested value
$81,856
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$81,856
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$13,061
US federal only · AMT risk: medium
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$92,533
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$47,749
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$69,577
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These illustrative values use the same calculation engine as the live calculator, but the underlying model is low-confidence for Gong. Use your own numbers as a starting point only. Try the calculator →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
89.02439M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
22% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Gong we use 22% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
22% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
IGV @ 3%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of IGV as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Gong. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.