← All companies

Databricks

Data & AI platform — Delta Lake, MLflow, Unity Catalog, plus the Mosaic foundation-model stack.

Data/CloudUnited States·Founded 2013·ISO/NSO equity·databricks.com ↗
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
Current estimate
4 methods · Source-audited Jun 12, 2026Medium confidence (51%)
$133.6B
range $104.7B – $162.5B
Implied per-share: $172.4 · vs last primary 0%

No verified public secondary-market signal available for Databricks. The estimate relies on last confirmed financing, peer multiples, sector momentum, and time decay.

Valuation basis:Last primary roundSource-audited Jun 12, 2026
Last primary round
$134B
Series L · 5mo ago
Secondary signal
—
No verified secondary signal

No verified public secondary signal is available. Hiive/Forge links are monitoring links only, not evidence of a current executable price.

Headcount
8,000
employees · LinkedIn+18%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$5.4B
annual run rate · est.
◉
Reported funding talks — medium confidence · $165B–$175B range (2026-06, Reuters / The Information) Status: reported — not confirmed, does not override primary valuation. Reuters / The Information reported Databricks in talks to raise at $165B–$175B valuation (Jun 2026). Not yet closed — does not override lastPrimaryValuationB ($134B Series L, Feb 2026).

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

✓

Source verification: CNBC Feb 2026 · Bloomberg Dec 2024 · manual-source-audit-2026-06

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorData/Cloudhigh
HeadquartersUnited Stateshigh
Founded2013high
Websitedatabricks.comhigh
Last primary round
Post-money valuation$134Bhigh
Round nameSeries Lhigh
Date2026-02-09 (5 months ago)high
Lead investorInsight Partners / Fidelity / J.P. Morgan Asset Managementhigh
Amount raised$7.0Bmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares775Mlow
Implied share price (4-method estimate)$172medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$5,400Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)24.8xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)8,000medium
Employees (12 months ago)6,800medium
12-month headcount growth+18%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyWCLDmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)22%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$134Blatest · Series L
Total growth
4×
$0.0B$39.5B$79.1B$119B$158B$38.0BSeries H$43.0BSeries I$62.0BSeries JlatestSeries L
Primary round
Down round
Series L+116%2026-02-09
$134.0B
Led by Insight Partners / Fidelity / J.P. Morgan Asset Management · raised $7.0B
Source: Databricks blog · confirmed by CNBC Feb 2026 ↗
Series J+44%2024-12-17
$62.0B
Led by Andreessen Horowitz · raised $10.0B
Source: Bloomberg Dec 2024(historical ref.)
Series I+13%2023-09-14
$43.0B
Led by T. Rowe Price · raised $500M
Source: TechCrunch(historical ref.)
Series H2021-08-31
$38.0B
Led by Counterpoint · raised $1.6B
Source: Reuters(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

No active listings found

We monitor Hiive, Forge Global, and EquityZen for Databricks listings. As of July 2026, no verified secondary market activity has been recorded.

Secondary listings for private companies appear without announcement and typically close within days. When a listing appears, it often signals an upcoming tender offer or funding round.

Primary round history as valuation signal

In the absence of secondary market data, the funding history below is the primary valuation anchor. Method C (time-decay) uses this data to estimate current value.

Series L · 2026-02$134B
Series J · 2024-12$62B
Series I · 2023-09$43B

Get notified when a listing appears

Pro subscribers get notified within 2 hours when a secondary listing for Databricks is detected. Most employees first hear about tender offers days after the market already knows.

Get listing alerts →

Check directly: Hiive ↗ · Forge Global ↗ · SEC Form D ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CFLTConfluent7x
DDOGDatadog, Inc.25.64x
ESTCElastic N.V.3.52x
MDBMongoDB, Inc.11.11x
NETCloudflare, Inc.37.54x
SNOWSnowflake Inc.17.99x

Typical strike prices by cohort

Strike ranges by cohort: aggregated from Glassdoor, Teamblind threads, Carta's published industry data and reports from employees. Indicative only — your actual 409A at grant time is the only authoritative number.

2021 cohort
$35–$55
per share
2022 cohort
$40–$60
per share
2023 cohort
$45–$65
per share
2024 cohort
$60–$80
per share
2025 cohort
$85–$110
per share

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $95.0B75% confidence
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 19.6x → 10% private-company discount → 17.6x on $5400M revenue
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%suppressed25% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
No verified secondary market data available — estimate relies on primary round, peer multiples, and sector momentum.
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $160.1B77% confidence
$134B round (2026-02-09) × 1.22× growth × 0.98× multiple decay over 0.4 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $145.0B54% confidence
$134B × (1 + 22% p.j.)^0.4yr = $145.0B via WCLD ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
51%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Databricks 24 months ago (2024-07-03) with 2,000 options at a strike price of $70/share, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$172
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$172,383
vested shares × implied price
Exercise cost
$70,000
1,000 × $70 strike
Net of exercise
$102,383
gross − exercise cost
Tax (rough)
$17,614
US federal only · AMT risk: medium
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$124,868
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$30,557
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$76,526
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
775M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
10% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Databricks we use 10% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
65% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
WCLD @ 22%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of WCLD as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Databricks. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.