← All companies

Bolt

Estonian super-app for urban mobility — ride-hailing, e-scooters, e-bikes, car-sharing, and food delivery operating in 500+ cities across 45 countries. Series F at $8.4B (Jan 2022, Sequoia Capital / D1 Capital); revenue ~$1.1B. Built on hyper-local pricing and driver-friendly commission rates (15% vs. Uber's 25%) to win market share in Europe, Africa, and Latin America.

Consumer🇺🇸 EEFounded 2013RSU equitybolt.eu
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 24, 2026Medium confidence (40%)
$15.4B
range $2.1B – $28.6B⚠ methods disagree (6.8× spread)
Implied per-share: $54.9 · vs last primary +83%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$8.4B
Series F · 53mo ago
Secondary signal
$20.8B
Hiive · 2026-05+148%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
4,500
employees · LinkedIn+13%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$1.1B
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorConsumerhigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 EEhigh
Founded2013high
Websitebolt.euhigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$8.4Bhigh
Round nameSeries Fhigh
Date2022-01-01 (53 months ago)high
Lead investorSequoia Capital / D1 Capitalhigh
Amount raised$711Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares280Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$55medium
Primary equity type grantedRSUhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$1,100Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)7.6xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)4,500medium
Employees (12 months ago)4,000medium
12-month headcount growth+13%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxySOCLmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)8%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$8.4Blatest · Series F
Total growth
84×
Our estimate
$15.4B
$0.0B$4.5B$9.1B$13.6B$18.1BSeries BSeries CSeries D$4.8BSeries ElatestSeries Fest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series F+77%2022-01-01
$8.4B
Led by Sequoia Capital / D1 Capital · raised $711M
Source: TechCrunch Jan 2022
Series E+150%2021-05-14
$4.8B
Led by Sequoia Capital Europe · raised $600M
Source: TechCrunch May 2021
Series D+280%2020-11-01
$1.9B
Led by Naya Capital · raised $150M
Source: TechCrunch Nov 2020
Series C+400%2019-06-01
$0.5B
Led by Didi Chuxing · raised $67M
Source: TechCrunch Jun 2019
Series B2017-03-01
$0.1B
Led by Daimler · raised $14M
Source: Crunchbase

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$20.8B+197% vs first recorded
Trade
Bid
$4.5B$10.7B$16.9B$23.3B2025-092026-022026-042026-05

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-05-02tradeHiive$32
2026-04-10tradePublic Report$30
2026-02-22bidHiive$30

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
PINSPinterest, Inc.2.47x
RBLXRoblox Corporation6.51x
SNAPSnap Inc.1.55x
SPOTSpotify Technology S.A.6.1x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $3.9B23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 4.8x → 25% private-company discount → 3.6x on $1100M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($21B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $16.1B70% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 4 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $26.7B20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$8.4B round (2022-01-01) × 3.74× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 4.4 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $11.7B10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$8.4B × (1 + 8% p.j.)^4.4yr = $11.7B via SOCL ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
40%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Bolt 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 units, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$55
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$54,863
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$54,863
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$7,123
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$62,020
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$32,004
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$46,634
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
280M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
25% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Bolt we use 25% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
35% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
SOCL @ 8%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of SOCL as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Bolt. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.